
One of the fun things about blogs is that we can invent our own lingo, our own signature vernacular, sassy new uses for punctuation, or even entire new words — with much grammatical hilarity ensuing.
And then I log off and go about my business, and inevitably — we’re talking at least once a day — my button-down, squarepants editor’s brain short-circuits and puts me in a temporarily foul mood.
My two gripes of the day:
Random capitalization: Don’t do It. There are rules, people! Brand names? Capitalize away. People’s names? Why, by all means, please uppercase as appropriate. Trademarked words, streets, cities, countries, companies, religions, book titles, off-Broadway musicals — yes, yes, yes! Job titles? Step away from the “Shift” key.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but you are not a Software Engineer, a Human Resources Director or a Dermatologist. You’re a software engineer, a human resources director or a dermatologist. I’m sure you are very important, but nope — you’re also a lowercase worker of the world, just like the rest of us Joe Schmoes. (See? A name — now that’s capitalized.) Different rules apply when using formal titles before personal names — as in President Roosevelt, Sen. Finkelstein or King Phillip.
People also lose their minds when talking about moms and dads. I agree — being a mom or a dad is an important job, but importance does not substantiate capitalization. “Mom” and “Dad” should be capitalized only when used in place of a mom’s or dad’s personal name. When referring to the role of a mom or a dad, but not substituting a name (”She’s a great mom.” “He’s a stay-at-home dad.”), or when writing about your mom, his dad, this mom, that dad, don’t capitalize.
- Incorrect: “My Mom is a Software Engineer.” (Mom should not be capitalized here, because it’s not substituting for a name in this sentence. Software engineer should not be capitalized either. Really!)
- Correct: “My mom is a software engineer. My sister says Mom is programming an assassin bot to neutralize President Bush and restore reality to its proper path in the time-space continuum.” (In the first sentence, mom is in lowercase because it’s not substituting for a name. In the second sentence, however, Mom is correctly capitalized, as one could replace it with her proper name to convey the same meaning.)
- Correct: “As we all know, Mom is a software engineer. She’s the coolest mom ever!” (Again, here, in the first sentence, the capitalization is warranted, as Mom is really being used in place of her name. In the second sentence, mom isn’t standing in for her name, so it’s lowercase.)
Improper usage of the word literally: People, to sum things up, the word literally should not be used liberally. Literal means “word for word,” or “verbatim.” In other words, literally refers to being or doing something exactly as written.
- Incorrect: “Air Supply is coming to town? I am literally their biggest fan!” Unless the speaker could ascertain that he or she is, in fact, the ’80s pop duo’s physically largest devotee, this would not be an accurate statement.
- Incorrect: “I was literally blown away by the response to my recent blog post about creative uses for clothespins.” The only instances in which I can imagine being literally blown away by something would be in the case of an extremely severe weather event — and how impressive, to live to tell about it.
- Correct: “She was literally tied up all afternoon. I guess she’s into that sort of thing.”
Some of your busy little brains are probably kicking into overdrive now, trying to think of exceptions, special cases, or other sinister ways in which to foil my master plan.
Face it. I am right. That’s the best thing about blogs.
<running away, cackling with impish glee>




My big grammar gripes that I see time and again in discussion groups:
Mixing up
“there” and “they’re”
“your” and “you’re”
“to” and “too”
Those are so basic!
Rock on, Jin-in!
Hm, you didn’t mention god/God dilemma. I personally prefer ‘god’ because I like the generic feeling of all encompassing higher power and not ‘God’ that specific god who’d smite me for not coming to HIS church on 23 Birdseye View Lane, Heaven, Godsland 11523.
Oh and how about capitalization to indicate volume? Yes, I’m guilty.
Wasn’t there an SNL or Mad TV skit about “literally”? Sigh, you’d think people would catch on by now. (Yes, I did use ’sigh’ as an interjection.) By the way, I found the ‘grouchy editor face’ to be alluring, not scary at all.
I read your blog faithfully, but today was very glad I’m reading on my lunch hour– no one heard me snorting and snickering with your last example.
So, if I called you “Worthy Defender of Grammatical Purity”, would that be a formal title and thus capitalized, or merely a job description and thus not capitalized?
w00t! Thanks for the reminders. I probably do all of those and more. I’m famous for my typos and have been chastised by friends and family alike for my random use of commas, my misspellings and incorrect use of its/it’s.
My English teacher use to go nuts over how “the rules” seemed to be changing, how slang words were being added to the dictionary and new meanings were taking the place of old words.
I thought capitalizing job titles was just another one of those rule changes. Durr…
As a 7th grade English teacher, you are preaching to the choir here. My favorite pet peeve? People who use “irregardless”. Not a word! It’s a double negative, which we don’t use in English.
Yes, well those were just the TWO things that were giving me grief yesterday. Believe me, there are lots more where those came from!
wow– you ARE a grouchy editor!
I’m sure I’ve made these mistakes many times myself. I will probably make them again. Irregardless, I hope you can still understand me. Kidding, kidding…
First, I love that grouchy looking cat you have. Makes me wanna rough it out with him just to see what will happen.
I have to say I’m also guilty of mixing the use of this and these and using lower case for names of people. I hope my english teachers won’t haunt me from her grave because I’ve forgotten what she considers as the basics.
Grammar errors usually appear when I am either sneaking in an entry at work or half asleep while typing.
SORRY to annoy! And I capitalized that one for emphasis. :p
You’d fit in right at home here with us! My wife always makes fun of me for yelling at the TV whenever I witness the improper use of English on television. The truth is that she’s almost as bad.
Okay, I thought I would ask… obviously, you don’t have to, in fact, you have no reason to share with us aparents anything, but for those of us who don’t have a password can you give us a hint what your most valuable lesson is as a TRA? I am always interested in hearing your voice about this issue.
Well said, Ms. Cat! You are obviously a very good Editor.
Sorry, had to get you back for running off with glee…
I literally smiled when I saw that Persian Cat Photo.
Oh, thank goodness somebody still cares.
Ji-in,
Do you provide your services for a poor grad student currently writing a paper on reading disabilities?? Kidding of course..ok maybe not, I always end up needing some type of editing help so thanks for the lesson on capital letters
BTW–love that cat photo.
*shudders*
*goes back to fine-combing manuscript*
As a mother, my grammatical focus is on the proper use of verbs. For example, my sons sometimes tell me, “I brushed my teeth.” A quick investigation may reveal a simple grammatical error. Hmmm, I believe that you used the past tense and I’d like to see the present continuous “I am brushing.” (I think that continuous part has to do with how two minutes with a tooth brush in the mouth of a school age child can feel like forever.) Eventually, my sons get to the future tense, “I will brush my teeth as soon as you stop this lecture.”
Great post. I love grammar. Along with “literally,” you could have also mentioned the word “ignorant.” I absolutely hate it when I hear someone say something like, “Don’t be ignorant,” and what they mean is “Stop acting rudely.” These two sentences ARE NOT THE SAME.
PS Are all caps okay to portray emphasis? Hope so!
post like this are proof that you are judging me in IMs
I hate grammar. It is an imprecise science that only small weevels actually understand. It has been proven that we humans can understand over one thousand non-verbal gestures, but I don’t think those gestures follow any grammatical format. Therefore, as a teacher and a writer, I ask all of you – implore you all – to let grammar alone. He’s getting pissed off about being misused and misrepresented all the time.
Can’t we just let sleeping dogs lie? (Note, I believe that “maxim” is a grammatically incorrect sentence.)
Betsy — Actually, as a freelance editor/writer, I do hire out my nerdiness on occasion to grad students and academic types for proofreading, copy-editing and varying levels of editorial services. References are available upon request.
Hyuntae — Aw, now that’s not true. I didn’t even mentally proofread your comment until the second pass. Now that’s restraint!
I can’t stand it when people mix up ‘pique’ and ‘peak’. It did not ‘pique your interest’, demmit. And ‘in lieu of’ and ‘in light of’? Sigh.
‘Literally’ is now widely accepted as an intensifying term – it’s down in the Oxford as an informal use, and has been discussed by linguists etc. I don’t like it either because it’s terribly careless, and I think they’re being too eager with collecting new entries for vocabulary meant to define our day and age.
Sorry, I meant to say ‘peak your interest’. *falls over*